MILLER, Thomas Ezekiel

MILLER, Thomas Ezekiel
Image courtesy of Moorland–Spingarn Research Center, Howard University
1849–1938

Concise Biography

MILLER, Thomas Ezekiel, a Representative from South Carolina; born in Ferrebeville, Beaufort County, S.C., June 17, 1849; moved with his parents to Charleston, S.C., in 1851; attended the public schools in Charleston, S.C., and in Hudson, N.Y.; employed as a newsboy on a railroad; was graduated from Lincoln University, Chester County, Pa., in 1872; moved to Grahamville, S.C., and served as school commissioner of Beaufort County in 1872; member of the State house of representatives in 1874-1880, 1886-1887, and 1894-1896; studied law; was admitted to the bar in 1875 and practiced law in Beaufort, S.C.; member of the State executive committee 1878-1880; served in the State senate in 1880; successfully contested as a Republican the election of William Elliott to the Fifty-first Congress and served from September 24, 1890, to March 3, 1891; unsuccessful candidate for reelection in 1890 to the Fifty-second Congress; again a member of the State house of representatives in 1894; member of the State constitutional convention in 1895; president of the State college in Orangeburg, S.C., from 1896 until 1911, when he resigned; retired from active pursuits in 1911 and lived in Charleston, S.C., until 1923, when he moved to Philadelphia, Pa.; in 1934 returned to Charleston, S.C., where he resided until his death there on April 8, 1938; interment in Brotherhood Cemetery.

View Record in the Biographical Directory of the U.S. Congress

[ Top ]

Extended Biography

A seasoned local and state politician, Thomas E. Miller joined the U.S. House of Representatives after a contested election in 1890. Miller brought his extensive experience fighting for Black civil and political rights in post-Civil War South Carolina to an abbreviated term in the 51st Congress (1889–1891). With little time to legislate, Miller used his new position as a platform to protest the deterioration of Black civil and political rights occurring in the South. “I shall not be muffled here,” Miller declared on the House Floor. “I am in part the representative of the living; of those whose rights are denied; of those who are slandered by the press, on the lecture platform, in the halls of legislation, and oftentimes by men in the livery of heaven, and I deem it my supreme duty to raise my voice, though feebly, in their defense.”1

Thomas Ezekiel Miller was born on June 17, 1849, in Ferrebeeville, South Carolina. He was raised by Richard and Mary Ferrebee Miller. Many years later, Thomas Miller recalled that his father was White and claimed that his mother was the daughter of Judge Thomas Heyward, who had signed the Declaration of Independence.2

By the late 1850s, Thomas Miller was living in Charleston, South Carolina, attending illegal schools for free Black children, and selling the Charleston Mercury newspaper at hotels. During the Civil War, Miller delivered newspapers on the railroad line that ran between Charleston and Savannah, Georgia. He was made assistant conductor of the railroad, which required him to wear the uniform of the Confederate army because the rebel government controlled the railroads. Captured by Union forces in January 1865, he spent two weeks in a Savannah prison camp before his release. When the Civil War ended, Miller went to Hudson, New York, where once again he sold newspapers on a railroad line. He finished his education at the Hudson School, just north of New York City, before earning a scholarship to Lincoln University, a school for African-American students, in Chester County, Pennsylvania. After graduating in 1872, Miller returned to South Carolina, where he won his first elective office as school commissioner of coastal Beaufort County. He subsequently moved to Columbia and studied law at the newly integrated University of South Carolina. He continued his legal studies under the tutelage of state solicitor P.L. Wiggins and state supreme court justice Franklin L. Moses Sr. Admitted to the South Carolina bar in December 1875, Miller set up his practice in Beaufort, South Carolina, seat of the coastal county where he had won his first election just three years before. In 1874 he married Anna Hume, with whom he had nine children.3

Shortly after establishing his law practice, Thomas Miller was elected to the state general assembly where he served until 1880 before securing a term in the state senate. Miller was deeply involved in attempts to revive the flagging South Carolina Republican Party after Democrats led by Governor Wade Hampton gained control of the state in 1877. He served as a member of the Republican state executive committee from 1878 to 1880. Miller was also a customs inspector and served in the state militia throughout the 1880s. He unsuccessfully sought the Republican nomination for a U.S. House seat in 1884, and in 1886 he returned to the state house of representatives for one year.4

In 1888, Miller entered the race for a seat in the U.S. House that had been formerly occupied by Black Representative and Civil War hero Robert Smalls. Covering the center of the South Carolina’s pre-Civil War rice and cotton plantations, the “shoestring district” had narrow borders that twisted from Sumter County in the center of the state to Georgetown and parts of Charleston on the coast. African-American residents were 82 percent of the gerrymandered district’s population. Republicans expected Smalls to run in 1888 to avenge his 1886 election loss to Democrat William Elliott, an outcome Smalls unsuccessfully contested. But Miller’s supporters convinced Smalls to defer. Facing the incumbent Elliott, Miller received financial backing from Randall D. George, one of the wealthiest Black men in the state. Representative Elliott was initially declared the winner by slightly more than 1,000 votes, with 54 percent to Miller’s 45 percent of the vote.5

Miller contested the election, charging that many registered Black voters had been prevented from casting their ballots. Though the Republican-controlled Committee on Elections in the 51st Congress ruled in Miller’s favor, his case did not come up on the House Floor until September 23, 1890, immediately after a vote seating Virginia’s first Black Representative, John M. Langston. Democratic Members had tried to obstruct the seating of Langston by deserting the House Chamber in an effort to prevent a quorum; however, Republican Speaker Thomas Brackett Reed of Maine declared a quorum present and held a vote to seat Langston.6

Inspired by their success seating Langston, House Republicans moved quickly to take up Miller’s claim. Representative Charles Triplett O’Ferrall of Virginia, who was charged with looking after the Democratic Party’s interests during the Langston vote, protested that the case was unexpected and reiterated previous complaints that a quorum was not present. Daniel Kerr of Iowa asked for 20 minutes to debate the nomination. Accusing Democrats of conspiring to stonewall Miller’s consideration, Speaker Reed shut down all protest. Shouts from the packed Republican side of the chamber implored the Speaker to call a vote. Over O’Ferrall’s vehement protests, the House seated Miller by a vote of 157 to 1. Elliott was unseated, and the following day Miller was sworn in and was assigned to the Committee on Labor.7

Miller got to work and began introducing legislation almost immediately. Six days after his swearing-in, he submitted a bill to appropriate funds for the construction of a monument to Black Union soldiers. The proposal would have also created a commission of three former Union generals—former Representative Benjamin Franklin Butler of Massachusetts, Oliver O. Howard, and William Birney—tasked with choosing the monument’s location. Miller also introduced legislation to fund, construct, and operate a home for Black Americans who had been formerly enslaved and needed assistance in old age.8

Miller only had a week on Capitol Hill before the first session of the 51st Congress concluded on October 1. He then returned to South Carolina to run for re-election to the 52nd Congress (1891–1893). In November 1890, in a campaign once again funded by Randall George, Miller won an apparent victory in a three-way contest that included White Independent Republican candidate Ellery M. Brayton and former Representative Elliott, the Democrat whom Miller had unseated in September. Elliott insisted the vote count was fraudulent and contested the results. On November 9, the South Carolina supreme court, seizing on minor details such as discrepancies in paper size, color, font sizes, and weights, ruled that Miller’s ballots were illegal and that Elliott was therefore the winner. Miller contested the court’s decision before the House of Representatives and returned for the final session of the 51st Congress with the election still unresolved. He submitted just three private bills during the three-month session but made two significant speeches on pressing matters for Black Americans in the South.9

On January 12, 1891, Miller spoke in favor of Massachusetts Representative Henry Cabot Lodge’s bill authorizing the federal government to oversee federal elections and protect voters from violence and intimidation. Miller urged the Senate to join the House in passing the Lodge proposal, which he considered to be a crucial means of undermining the “infernal lynch law” employed across the region against African-American voters. Republicans had delivered a number of federal appointments to Black Americans, but voting rights protections were more important, he said. Only then could Black Americans elect candidates that might take action to arrest the growth of extrajudicial terror in the South. “Offices are only emblems of what we need and what we ought to have,” Miller pleaded. “We need protection at home in our rights, the chiefest of which is the right to live.”10

Miller worked to secure Black Americans a place of respect in a peaceful and prosperous South. On February 14, 1891, Miller rebutted a discriminatory speech by Senator Alfred Holt Colquitt of Georgia, in which he blamed southern freed people for slowing regional economic development. Miller’s passionate reply took on Colquitt point by point, arguing that it was White southerners who encouraged economic stagnation by exploiting Black farmers and denying Black Americans full citizenship. “It is not the negro,” he said, “that keeps Northern capital and Western energy from within the borders of the South land.” Rather, he argued, “it is the clannishness of the white citizens, it is the petty prejudices of the white citizens . . . it is the mean jealousy of the white citizen, it is his love of misjudging and misrepresenting historical achievements that drive from our borders thrift, capital, energy, and inventive genius.”11

Miller told his colleagues of the economic obstacles facing Black agricultural workers, citing the way many landowners paid tenant farmers in credit to be used only at certain stores, where merchants frequently charged exorbitant prices for their wares. He submitted copies of these credit notes to the Congressional Record, documenting how this system trapped Black workers in crushing debt.12

Miller, who was still contesting the 1890 election, acknowledged that he may lose his seat for speaking out against South Carolina Democrats but declared himself willing to pay that price. “If it should lose me a single vote, I will accept it. I have stated nothing but the truth; I have done nothing but my duty; I would not for anything do less,” he vowed. “I leave here possessed of the consciousness that I have endeavored to defend, in this Chamber, my people and my party.”13

When the House convened for the 52nd Congress in December 1891, Miller, now a private citizen, appealed to his former colleagues to overturn the state supreme court decision and declare him the winner of the 1890 contest against Elliott. However, the makeup of the new Congress was drastically different: Democrats now outnumbered Republicans nearly two-to-one. Their firm majority meant the Committee on Elections could stall consideration of Miller’s contest. In fact, the panel did not take up the case until one month before the end of the Congress: February 11, 1893. Indiana Republican Henry Underwood Johnson lambasted the committee for traveling “at the pace of the tardy snail” and submitted a resolution demanding that Miller’s case should be decided within five days. Although Speaker Charles Frederick Crisp of Georgia rejected Johnson’s resolution, the committee soon ruled against Miller on February 25, 1893. By that time, George Washington Murray had defeated Miller for the Republican nomination to represent the district in the 53rd Congress (1893–1895).14

While Murray went on to win election to the U.S. House, Miller returned to the South Carolina state house for a single term in 1894. For the next 40 years, he remained an active observer of politics. He also was one of six prominent South Carolina Black politicians—including former Representative Robert Smalls—who served as delegates to the 1895 state constitutional convention. White Democrats, led by then Senator Benjamin Ryan Tillman, dominated the convention and were determined to draft a new state constitution with measures designed to disenfranchise the state’s Black citizens. Miller and the Black delegates tried to delay convention resolutions and offer alternatives but were consistently rebuffed.15

Following the convention debacle, Miller redoubled his efforts to serve his community, especially through education, and helped establish the Colored Normal, Industrial, Agricultural and Mechanical College of South Carolina, which later became South Carolina State University. Although previously affiliated with Claflin University, a Black school staffed by White educators, the new college hired only Black teachers. Miller himself was named its first president when it opened in 1896. He held this position until 1911, when he was forced to resign by newly elected Governor Coleman Livingston Blease, a Democrat who Miller had opposed during the 1910 campaign.16

Miller later retired to Charleston, where he remained active in civic affairs. He supported American entry into World War I, helping to recruit more than 30,000 Black soldiers. He served on a Black subcommittee of the all-White state committee on civic preparedness during the war. By 1924, Miller had moved to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Miller testified before the House Judiciary Committee that year regarding several bills proposing to investigate race relations in the South.17

He returned to Charleston in 1934, where he lived with his daughter as his eyesight failed. Thomas Miller died in Charleston on April 8, 1938.18

Footnotes

1Congressional Record, House, 51st Cong., 2nd sess. (14 February 1891): 2695.

2William C. Hine, “Miller, Thomas Ezekiel,” American National Biography 15 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999): 518–520; “Interview with The Hon. T.E. Miller,” Federal Writers’ Project, 1936, WPA Federal Writers’ Project Materials on African American Life in South Carolina, South Caroliniana Library, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, https://digital.library.sc.edu/collections/wpa-federal-writers-project-materialson-african-american-life-in-south-carolina/.

3Hine, “Miller, Thomas Ezekiel,” American National Biography: 518–520; “Interview with The Hon. T.E. Miller,” Federal Writers’ Project, 1936; “Personals: Thomas E. Miller,” Journal of Negro History 23, no. 3 (July 1938): 402.

4Hine, “Miller, Thomas Ezekiel,” American National Biography: 518–520; “Interview with The Hon. T.E. Miller,” Federal Writers’ Project, 1936; Eric Foner, Freedom’s Lawmakers: A Directory of Black Officeholders During Reconstruction (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993): 150.

5Stanley B. Parsons et al., United States Congressional Districts, 1883–1913 (New York: Greenwood Press, 1990): 143; Andrew Billingsley, Yearning To Be Free: Robert Smalls of South Carolina and His Families (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2007): 161; George Brown Tindall, South Carolina Negroes, 1877–1900, 2nd ed. (1952; repr., Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2003): 128; Michael J. Dubin, United States Congressional Elections, 1788–1997 (Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers, 1998): 284.

6House Committee on Elections, Miller vs. Elliott, 51st Cong., 1st sess., H. Rept. 2502 (1890); Congressional Record, House, 51st Cong., 1st sess. (23 September 1890): 10338–10339.

7Congressional Record, House, 51st Cong., 1st sess. (23 September 1890): 10339; “Republicans Steal,” 24 September 1890, Atlanta Constitution: 1; “Langston Gets His Seat,” 24 September 1890, Chicago Daily Tribune: 7.

8H.R. 12166, 51st Cong. (1890); H.R. 12169, 51st Cong. (1890).

9Hine, “Miller, Thomas Ezekiel,” American National Biography: 518–520; Michael Dubin indicates that Elliott won by more than 400 votes—45 to 39 percent in a small turnout. Brayton won 16 percent of the vote. See Dubin, United States Congressional Elections, 1788–1997: 292. See also “Elliott Re-Elected to Congress,” 10 November 1890, New York Times: 1; “Will They Heed the Lesson?,” 17 November 1890, Washington Post: 4; Committee on Elections, Miller vs. Elliott, 52nd Cong., 2nd sess., H. Rept. 2569 (1893): 2; H.R. 12728, 51st Cong. (1891); H.R. 13181, 51st Cong. (1891); H.R. 12476, 51st Cong., (1891).

10Congressional Record, House, 51st Cong., 2nd sess. (12 January 1891): 1216.

11Congressional Record, House, 51st Cong., 2nd sess. (14 February 1891): 2691, 2694.

12Congressional Record, House, 51st Cong., 2nd sess. (14 February 1891): 2691–2696.

13Congressional Record, House, 51st Cong., 2nd sess. (14 February 1891): 2695.

14Dubin, United States Congressional Elections, 1788–1997: 301; Congressional Record, House, 52nd Cong., 2nd sess. (11 February 1893): 1489–1494; Committee on Elections, Miller vs. Elliott, 52nd Cong., 2nd sess., H. Rept. 2569 (1893).

15Hine, “Miller, Thomas Ezekiel,” American National Biography: 518–520; Stephen Kantrowitz, Ben Tillman and the Reconstruction of White Supremacy (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000): 221–226.

16William C. Hine, “South Carolina State College: A Legacy of Education and Public Service,” Agricultural History 65, no. 2 (Spring 1991): 151–152.

17Hine, “Miller, Thomas Ezekiel,” American National Biography: 518–520; Hearings before the House Committee on the Judiciary, H.R. 3228 and H.R. 5564, 68th Cong., 1st sess. (1924): 37.

18“Interview with The Hon. T.E. Miller,” Federal Writers’ Project, 1936; “Hon. T.E. Miller, Last S.C. Race Congressman, Grandfather of Miss Anne M. Cooke, Passes Away,” 13 April 1938, Atlanta Daily World: 1; “Personals: Thomas E. Miller,” Journal of Negro History 23, no. 3 (July 1938): 400–402; “T.E. Miller, 88, Dies; Ex-Representative,” 10 April 1938, New York Times: 47.

[ Top ]

Bibliography / Further Reading

"Thomas Ezekiel Miller" in Black Americans in Congress, 1870-2007. Prepared under the direction of the Committee on House Administration by the Office of History & Preservation, U.S. House of Representatives. Washington: Government Printing Office, 2008.

[ Top ]

Committee Assignments

Committee Name & Date Congresses Congresses
Labor
[1883-1947]
48th through 79th Congresses
(See also the following standing committees: Education and Labor; Education and the Workforce)
51st (1889–1891)
51st (1889–1891)
[ Top ]