In 1991, Gary A. Franks became the first ever Black
Representative from Connecticut and the first Black
Republican Representative since 1935. On Capitol Hill,
Franks championed Republican issues, including welfare
reform, opposition to affirmative action, and support for
Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas. “The whole
Republican philosophy is self-help,” Franks avowed. “I
believe in less government. I believe that we don’t have to
tax and spend constantly to maintain our society.” Franks’s
party identification and political beliefs put him at odds
with most of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), of
which he was an active member. But Franks argued he
was representing a vein of Black political thought rarely
represented at the national level. “I see being a black
Republican as unique,” Franks explained, “I don’t see being
a black conservative as unique. I have a lot of views that
many in the black community would agree with.”1
Gary Alvin Franks was born in Waterbury, Connecticut,
on February 9, 1953. He was the youngest of six children
of Jenary Petteway Franks, a dietary aide at a hospital,
and Richard Franks, a mill worker who left school in the
sixth grade. Education was valued in the Franks home; all
the children attended college, and three earned doctoral
degrees. Gary Franks was an all-state basketball player
at Sacred Heart High School in Waterbury. In 1975, he
earned a bachelor’s degree from Yale University. After
working as an industrial relations agent for three companies
in Connecticut, Franks started his own real estate firm in
Waterbury. Inspired by his friend, Representative John
Rowland of Connecticut, Franks entered politics to bring
what he called “new blood” to the Waterbury Republican
Party. In 1985, he was elected to the Waterbury board of
aldermen, where he served three terms until 1990. Franks
ran unsuccessfully for state comptroller in 1986. Franks
married Donna Williams in 1990. The couple raised three
children: Azia, who was Donna Williams’s child from a
previous relationship, Jessica, and Gary Jr.2
In 1990, Rowland, whose district encompassed a mix
of working-class and wealthy towns in western and central
Connecticut, including Gary Franks’s hometown of
Waterbury, resigned his House seat to run for governor of
Connecticut. Franks sought the Republican nomination and
won the GOP endorsement by beating out five candidates
at the district’s Republican convention in July 1990. In
the general election, Franks faced former Democratic
Representative and television anchor Anthony John “Toby”
Moffett Jr.; Moffett had been elected to Congress in 1974
to represent a neighboring Connecticut district and served
four terms before losing bids for the U.S. Senate in 1982
and as Connecticut governor in 1986. Franks’s campaign
drew national attention. Though a Republican had held the
district since Rowland upset the Democratic incumbent in
1984, the seat was considered vulnerable. Waterbury’s blue
collar southern suburbs had tilted Republican in recent
elections. The district contained a small Black population
(under five percent). Franks ran on a conservative platform,
promising no new taxes, supporting a cut in the capital
gains tax, and advocating a constitutional amendment
outlawing the desecration of the American flag. He also
attacked welfare and other aid programs for creating what
he called a “spiral of government dependency.” Franks won
the election with 52 percent of the vote. As the first Black
Republican Representative in five decades, Franks attracted
a barrage of media attention, making him one of the most
recognizable first-term Members.3
When Franks took his seat in January 1991, he received
assignments on the Armed Services and Small Business
Committees, as well as on the Select Committee on Aging.
He also joined the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC),
which traditionally supported an active federal government
and strong social safety net. Franks spoke regularly at CBC
meetings during his first term, and he often disagreed with
the caucus’s other members, all of whom were Democrats.
For example, during his campaign, Franks opposed the
proposed Civil Rights Act of 1990, which the CBC almost
universally supported. When Democrats revived the
legislation as the first bill of the 102nd Congress, Franks
opposed it as well. Franks claimed he disagreed with the
language but not the spirit of the bill, saying, “I question
whether some Democrats truly want a civil rights bill or
if they want a political issue.” Franks argued the 1991 bill
would compel employers to introduce quotas in their hiring
process, a common argument from the bill’s opponents.
Although Franks voted against the initial House bill in June
1991, he ultimately voted for a compromise version of the
Civil Rights Act of 1991 sponsored by Republican Senator
John Claggett Danforth of Missouri. The law strengthened
prohibitions against employment discrimination that had
been weakened by a series of Supreme Court decisions
and provided monetary rewards for victims of sexual
discrimination. The bill passed by large margins and President
George H.W. Bush signed it into law in November 1991.4
Franks also attracted national attention as the only
member of the CBC to support the Supreme Court
nomination of Clarence Thomas—an African-American
judge who was named to replace Thurgood Marshall, the
first Black Supreme Court Justice, when he retired. The
CBC rejected Thomas’s conservative record, particularly
his opposition to affirmative action. By contrast, Franks
defended him, calling the CBC’s refusal to endorse
Thomas “politics at its worst.” Franks noted that Thomas’s
“approach to issues may be different from liberals, but his
determination and concern for fairness and justice would be
the same.” The Senate confirmed him on October 15, 1991,
by a nearly party-line vote of 52 to 48.5
In 1992, Franks faced a difficult re-election against
Democratic probate judge James Lawlor and Independent
Lynn Taborsak, a former Democratic state representative.
Both opponents criticized Franks for what they called a
weak stance on federal plans to cancel the construction of
Seawolf submarines in Groton, Connecticut. The project
was important to the state’s economy and, as Connecticut’s
sole member on the Armed Services Committee, Franks
received mail from constituents about the rumored closing
of the military base in Groton. Concerned voters claimed he
was often unavailable for comment on the subject. Franks
dismissed the attacks as a liberal smear campaign spawned
by fear that he would lure African-American voters to the
Republican Party. On Election Day, Franks won with a
44 percent plurality after Lawlor and Taborsak split the
remaining votes. Two years later, in 1994, Connecticut state
senator James H. Maloney ran a similar race against Franks,
accusing him of being out of touch with his constituents.
Franks remained focused on his support of businesses and
welfare reform and pulled out another narrow victory, with
52 percent of the vote. In 1995, Franks served in the first
Republican House majority in 40 years after the GOP
routed Democrats in campaigns across the country.6
In his second term, Franks relinquished his seat on
the Armed Services Committee for an assignment to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce, a highly desirable
panel that usually requires Members to give up all other
committee assignments. He also returned as a member of
the CBC, which added 14 Representatives after the 1992
elections, bringing the organization’s membership to 40
and establishing it as a significant voting bloc. Franks had
previously been linked to Republican President Bush. But
when Democrat William J. Clinton defeated Bush in the
1992 presidential election, Franks lost influence within the
caucus. Several members of the CBC objected to Franks’s
attendance at the caucus’s Democratic policy strategy
sessions, insisting that he was a mole for the Republicans.7
In 1993, an exasperated Franks publicly announced his
intention to resign from the CBC, but he soon recanted,
citing an influx of phone calls and mail from constituents
imploring him not to resign. Although he continued to
criticize some of the caucus’s policies, Franks declared,
“As long as I am a Member of Congress and black, I will
continue to belong to the CBC.” As tensions continued
to rise, the CBC voted to exclude Franks from all but the
first half-hour of CBC meetings—traditionally reserved for
lunch—essentially preventing Franks from participating
in any formal caucus debate. Faced with growing negative
publicity, CBC chair Kweisi Mfume of Maryland eventually
smoothed over the rift, announcing in August 1993 that
Franks would be allowed full participation in all caucus
activities and promised that, during his tenure as chair,
the caucus would embrace “diversity and plurality.” Franks
nevertheless remained at odds with the majority of the
caucus and eventually stopped attending meetings.8
Franks played a significant role in crafting the GOP’s
welfare reform package, which was launched in the fall of
1995. The plan set strict penalties for aid recipients who
refused to look for work after having collected benefits
for two years and made welfare difficult for immigrants
to access. The plan also made it more burdensome for
mothers who could not determine their children’s paternity
to receive benefits. Franks spoke candidly about his own
relatives’ experience accessing federal aid, and he praised
the Republican plan because he said it would encourage
economic independence. “Our welfare system continues to
play the role of fish-delivery man for able-bodied people.
Instead, we should help—and insist—that able-bodied
people catch their own fish,” Franks said. In 1995, Franks
was appointed to the conference committee to resolve the
differences between the House and Senate versions of the
welfare reform bill. Franks successfully fought to retain
his proposal to encourage providing a debit card for food
stamps and other benefits. He also supported the House
bill’s version of the “family cap,” which limited the amount
of money per child families could receive and was included
in the final conference report. President Clinton vetoed the
bill on January 9, 1996, forcing Congress to start again with
new legislation that dropped both provisions.9
Franks opposed affirmative action more zealously than
many of his GOP colleagues, who had championed the issue
in their campaign to recapture the congressional majority.
At the time, federal policy provided special set-asides and
preferences for women and people of color, which Franks
argued were forms of discrimination. “I do not want my
children to feel that they are inferior to white children,” he
declared. “I do not want someone to put their thumb on
the scale in order for them to succeed.” In 1995, Franks
announced he was going to propose an amendment to an
appropriations bill that would, in his words, “eliminate
race- and gender-based set-aside programs for the awarding
of Federal contracts.” Although congressional Republicans
supported Franks’s opposition to set-asides many GOP
House Members objected to the abrupt nature of the
proposed change, preferring to first authorize an executive
review of affirmative action policies. Franks’s efforts ended
when the Republican-controlled Rules Committee refused
to allow his amendment to come to the floor for debate on
an appropriations bill. “I question the sincerity of a number
of Republicans on the issue,” Franks said to reporters.
“They love to get the political mileage out of it, but when
it comes time to vote, they don’t want to do it.” Franks
even questioned the sincerity of Speaker Newt Gingrich of
Georgia, claiming Gingrich had promised his support for
the amendment. Franks apologized to Gingrich, noting that
he would follow the Speaker’s lead on the issue.10
Although Franks supported much of Gingrich’s extensive
“Contract with America” reform package during both the
1994 campaign and the early stages of the 105th Congress
(1997–1999), he criticized proposed budget cuts he
claimed disproportionately affected women, people of color,
children, and urban centers. “Mr. Speaker,” Franks said on
the House Floor, “I am for dismantling the Great Society
programs and the Roosevelt New Deal, but I do not believe
that the solution is merely to cut, cap, or pass the buck to
the States.” Franks later voted against the cuts, alongside
only five other Republicans. Facing a tough re-election in
1996, however, Franks eagerly invited Gingrich to campaign
with him in Connecticut and touted the Contract with
America to voters.11
In the 1996 election, Democrat James H. Maloney
returned for a rematch against Franks in a campaign that
was largely a referendum on the implementation of the
GOP’s legislative agenda. On Election Day, Maloney
defeated Franks 52 percent to 46 percent. Though the long
coattails from President Clinton’s decisive re-election victory
factored into Franks’s defeat, he also attributed his loss to a
lack of support from the Republican Party—noting that the
GOP estimated he was well ahead in the polls just months
before the election and had refused to raise funds for what
seemed like a safe Republican seat.12
In 1998, Franks challenged incumbent Democratic
Senator Christopher John Dodd, an 18-year veteran of
the Senate whose father, Thomas, had preceded him in
the chamber. Franks pulled in support from Republicans,
including former Vice President J. Danforth Quayle,
who stumped for him. Franks described himself as a
“real conservative and a real Republican,” and campaigned
on the national issues he had championed in Congress.
He supported the creation of a modified flat income
tax and the elimination of capital gains and inheritance
taxes. Franks also endorsed a strong national defense, the
preservation of Medicare and Social Security, and the death
penalty. Ultimately, Dodd defeated Franks with 65 percent
of the vote.13
Following his congressional career, Franks returned
to his real estate business in Waterbury. He eventually
moved to Florida where he ran a scrap metal recycling
company in Fort Lauderdale. Franks also lectured at
several universities—including Georgetown University
in Washington, DC; Hampton University in Hampton,
Virginia; and the University of Virginia in Charlottesville,
Virginia—and wrote several books on the intersection of
politics, faith, and the Black experience. He continues to
speak on the issues of racial injustice and faith in politics.14
[ Top ]